pan
The pieces were mostly there to make this a good read but, the execution was lacking. The author should have consulted an anthropologist to get guidance on writing an ethnography-- and how to be less ethnocentric. The author warns the interviews are redundant in the beginning and unfortunately, these are the bulk of the book. The 'conclusion' was confusing because it begins by discussing Marie Laveau and then compared her to Delzora. It was odd.
2 likes