Feel like this could've gone somewhere different. It's set up as though it's going to be less history, more manifesto, but even the near history (2019) feels written as...history. the manifesto itself is the last sixth of the book, and while understandably US centric it still feels like more could've been said in a broad sense, after the /Euro/centric history lesson, which makes up at least half the book. Still worth reading but need to follow up.