I‘m pretty bummed because I was really excited to read this, & I think the author‘s intervention is an important one, but I did not really love this book. Even though I agree with many of her conclusions, I feel like she relies too much on ungenerous assertions (often without citations) and bizarre analogies. I wonder if I didn‘t vibe with the style of argumentation because she‘s a “philosophy person” instead of “political theory person” 🤷🏻♀️
3 likes