Home Feed
Home
Search
Search
Add Review, Blurb, Quote
Add
Activity
Activity
Profile
Profile
Big Fat Surprise: Why Butter, Meat and Cheese Belong in a Healthy Diet
Big Fat Surprise: Why Butter, Meat and Cheese Belong in a Healthy Diet | Nina Teicholz
6 posts | 6 read | 1 reading | 7 to read
A New York Times bestseller Named one of The Economist s Books of the Year 2014 Named one of The Wall Street Journal s Top Ten Best Nonfiction Books of 2014 Kirkus Reviews Best Nonfiction Books of 2014 Forbes s Most Memorable Healthcare Book of 2014 Named a Best Food Book of 2014 by Mother Jones Named one of Library Journal's Best Books of 2014 In The Big Fat Surprise, investigative journalist Nina Teicholz reveals the unthinkable: that everything we thought we knew about dietary fat is wrong. She documents how the low-fat nutrition advice of the past sixty years has amounted to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the entire population, with disastrous consequences for our health. For decades, we have been told that the best possible diet involves cutting back on fat, especially saturated fat, and that if we are not getting healthier or thinner it must be because we are not trying hard enough. But what if the low-fat diet is itself the problem? What if the very foods we ve been denying ourselves the creamy cheeses, the sizzling steaks are themselves the key to reversing the epidemics of obesity, diabetes, and heart disease? In this captivating, vibrant, and convincing narrative, based on a nine-year-long investigation, Teicholz shows how the misinformation about saturated fats took hold in the scientific community and the public imagination, and how recent findings have overturned these beliefs. She explains why the Mediterranean Diet is not the healthiest, and how we might be replacing trans fats with something even worse. This startling history demonstrates how nutrition science has gotten it so wrong: how overzealous researchers, through a combination of ego, bias, and premature institutional consensus, have allowed dangerous misrepresentations to become dietary dogma. With eye-opening scientific rigor, The Big Fat Surprise upends the conventional wisdom about all fats with the groundbreaking claim that more, not less, dietary fat including saturated fat is what leads to better health and wellness. Science shows that we have been needlessly avoiding meat, cheese, whole milk, and eggs for decades and that we can now, guilt-free, welcome these delicious foods back into our lives."
Amazon Indiebound Barnes and Noble WorldCat Goodreads LibraryThing
Pick icon
100%
review
SweetP1967
post image
Pickpick

A lot of interesting analyses of studies that have driven our national eating recommendations and beliefs about what constitutes healthy eating. The end analysis is that carbs are the main culprit of many diseases and we should be eating more fats, which is the eating plan I arrived at years ago, but it is still fascinating to read about how some of the most commonly held beliefs were established.

review
RamsFan1963
post image
Pickpick

To paraphrase Gordon Gecko from Wall Street, Fat is Good. It's good for you, it makes food taste better, and low fat diets are actually harmful to us. I've toiled for years on low fat, high carb diets with little to show for it, but my current ketoesque diet, full of meat, cheese and butter, has allowed me to drop 55 pounds and feel the best I have in years. 4 💥💥💥💥
2nd book finished for #CYOreadathon @Sace

Sace 2 books! 🎉🎉 4y
38 likes1 comment
review
CampbellTaraL
post image
Pickpick

Short review: I hate the name of this book because it is so pithy for such a deeply researched investigation into the unscientific basis of the US dietary guidelines. Ten years of work boiled down to click baity sounds bite. 🙄 I recommend this book.

Long review threaded in the comments because I have some things to say.

CampbellTaraL In the same vein as Gary Taubes' The Case Against Sugar, this book is a deeply researched powerhouse of information and revelation. Ten years worth of it, in fact. And to a degree of careful scrutiny that surpasses the efforts of those who have defined public dietary guidelines over the past 60-70 years. (cont) 4y
CampbellTaraL When people talk about nutrition science, it's conflated with the rigorous, and often ruthless, analysis standardized by the scientific method in science where nothing is sacred and independent replication is required. Scientists understand their biases and actively work to address these areas. (Cont) 4y
CampbellTaraL In some cases, scientists spend most of their time trying to disprove their own hypothesis, regardless of how much they may or may not want/expect for a particular outcome. Good science does not care about feelings. (Cont) 4y
See All 9 Comments
CampbellTaraL Nutrition science has not followed these same scientific principles, and it's at the detriment of three generations' health and lives. Teicholz has done an excellent job peeling back layer by layer every compounding "belief" our modern societies (namely US/UK) hold that are based on the hyperbolic zeal and fanaticism of men too desperate to be right, with domineering personalities that rival current day political bloviators. (Cont) 4y
CampbellTaraL If a data didn't align with their expected results, it was tossed out. If a person challenged study results, they shouted them down. When the public continued to get sicker, they pushed the blame onto consumers, declaring a society-spanning apparent lack of self-control. (Cont) 4y
CampbellTaraL It doesn't take long into the book to realize that the AHA (American Heart Association) and other prominent institutions base their dietary guidelines on shaky hypotheses, at best. What's worse is the fact that they quietly adjust their stance now that there are researchers disproving many of the key aspects of the guidelines. (Cont) 4y
CampbellTaraL Saturated fat, for example, is not indicative of heart disease, and the guidelines were adjusted to move that fact lower down the list of importance, but silently and without an official public declaration of having been wrong. The public still views a piece of bacon as the ultimate sin to health. (Cont) 4y
CampbellTaraL The book is tiring to read, not because of the writing nor the content itself, but because of the level wrongness that has steered generations of peoples' dietary decisions. The amount of disease and misery inflicted on people is appalling. It's exhausting. However, I highly recommend reading every page and taking the time to pull up every footnote and study cited; it's absolutely worth your time. (Cont) 4y
CampbellTaraL Lastly: the author acknowledges there is so much more that cannot be explored in this one book--again, ten years--the primary opposing concern is the environmental impact of animal-based food production. That topic alone is one that gives me pause, but it does not refute the fact that our current trajectory of obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and cancer are inhibiting our collective ability to live, and think, healthfully. (End) 4y
20 likes2 stack adds9 comments
review
lolaandrioo
Pickpick

5 of 5 Stars

blurb
JacqMac
post image

I‘m doing a little science-ing today. And craving a monstrous meaty dinner.

blurb
LindsayReads
post image

Alright, my Litten! Your goodies are on the way!
#SecretSantaGoesPostal #WinterSolsticeBookExchange

LeahBergen 😃🎉😃🎉 8y
45 likes2 comments