

Wh- um.... Okay, so, there's a solid portion of two or three of the essays in this little collection where I was following the thought process, and appreciating the unique points Perec was raising.
Otherwise I have to assume one of two hypotheses: either it made sense to him, he felt it was of enough value to write and publish, and I just couldn't follow the flow of the thoughts, OR he was kind of fucking with his readers, and he knew it. 1/?
I'm usually the first to happily go down a rabbit hole in the debate of how to classify, or why a thing is currently ordered the way it is, but that last essay felt like 20 halted half-thoughts rather than an exploration, and that's uniquely frustrating for someone with an 1w
I think maybe Perec wanted to make the point a couple times over that people can get very wrapped up in arbitrary fussiness about record keeping and the grouping of knowledge, but, the thing is, I like getting caught up in that stuff! 🤷🏼♂️
⚠️Heads up, the very first essay goes in depth on literature/life stories based on experiences in WW2 concentration camps. 1w