Home Feed
Home
Search
Search
Add Review, Blurb, Quote
Add
Activity
Activity
Profile
Profile
Murder On The Train
Murder On The Train: A Miscarriage of Justice in Edwardian Northumberland | John J Eddleston
1 post | 1 read
In the spring of 1910, a shocking murder rocked Edwardian England. John Innes Nisbet, a quiet, unassuming man, was found brutally shot five times in the head aboard the 10.27 Newcastle Central train, and the colliery wages he had been carrying were stolen. Days later, John Alexander Dickman, a gambler by trade, was arrested and convicted of the crime, despite the conviction resting solely on circumstantial evidence.
Sent to the gallows, Dickman maintained his innocence until the end. Over a century later, this gripping investigation reopens the case, re-examining the evidence and exposing the flaws in Dickman’s conviction. Could the real killer have escaped justice? With new insights and a compelling alternative theory, Murder on the Train unveils what might truly have happened that fateful day.
Amazon Indiebound Barnes and Noble WorldCat Goodreads LibraryThing
Pick icon
100%
review
OutsmartYourShelf
post image
Pickpick

England, 1910 & John Innes Nisbet boarded a train to work, carrying with him the colliery wages as usual but by the end of the journey, his body was found stuffed underneath the carriage seats in an empty carriage compartment. Nisbet had been shot 5 times with 2 different guns & the money stolen. A local man, John Alexander Dickman was arrested after several witnesses saw Nisbet with a man identified as Dickman at the station before boarding.

OutsmartYourShelf Despite extremely flimsy evidence, Dickman was sent for trial, found guilty, & hanged for the crime despite maintaining his innocence to the end. This book examines the evidence & asks if the real killer escaped justice, before giving a compelling alternative theory for what might have happened that day.

It certainly seems that this was a shocking case of a miscarriage of justice.
2w
OutsmartYourShelf Whilst reading through this, it became clear that the case itself rested on circumstantial evidence including a couple of very shaky eyewitness testimonies. Indeed if you remove one of the eyewitness stories & posit instead that the witness was not telling the truth, then alternative suspects come into focus.

A great pity that we will probably never know the truth & that a likely innocent man was executed. A very interesting read. 4🌟
2w
27 likes3 comments