Home Feed
Home
Search
Search
Add Review, Blurb, Quote
Add
Activity
Activity
Profile
Profile
Science Fictions
Science Fictions: How Fraud, Bias, Negligence, and Hype Undermine the Search for Truth | Stuart Ritchie
2 posts | 1 read | 2 to read
An insider’s view of science reveals why many scientific results cannot be relied upon – and how the system can be reformed. Science is how we understand the world. Yet failures in peer review and mistakes in statistics have rendered a shocking number of scientific studies useless – or, worse, badly misleading. Such errors have distorted our knowledge in fields as wide-ranging as medicine, physics, nutrition, education, genetics, economics, and the search for extraterrestrial life. As Science Fictions makes clear, the current system of research funding and publication not only fails to safeguard us from blunders but actively encourages bad science – with sometimes deadly consequences. Stuart Ritchie’s own work challenging an infamous psychology experiment helped spark what is now widely known as the “replication crisis,” the realization that supposed scientific truths are often just plain wrong. Now, he reveals the very human biases, misunderstandings, and deceptions that undermine the scientific endeavor: from contamination in science labs to the secret vaults of failed studies that nobody gets to see; from outright cheating with fake data to the more common, but still ruinous, temptation to exaggerate mediocre results for a shot at scientific fame. Yet Science Fictions is far from a counsel of despair. Rather, it’s a defense of the scientific method against the pressures and perverse incentives that lead scientists to bend the rules. By illustrating the many ways that scientists go wrong, Ritchie gives us the knowledge we need to spot dubious research and points the way to reforms that could make science trustworthy once again.
LibraryThing
Pick icon
100%
review
shanaqui
Pickpick

I steamed through this in a day; very clear and well-written, and the perfect accompaniment to the pharmacoepidemiology course I did a week or two ago and the emphasis on how to detect poor science. It's sobering, but it does also offer an important perspective on how to fix the problem. Though it's pop-science, I think other scientists could benefit from it too.

blurb
shanaqui
post image

A new book from earlier this week, from another friend! Biscuit's aaall over this one. #BunniesofLitsy

BookishMarginalia 💜💜💜 3y
geodynamical_nonfiction How was this book? 3y
shanaqui @geodynamical Haven't read it yet, I'm afraid! Curse of the neverending TBR pile. 😅 3y
geodynamical_nonfiction Oh gotcha! It‘s a new book, less than a year old and my science friends recommend it! 3y
12 likes4 comments