
This is kinda... part history, part trying to tell a story. There's a lot more fictional recreation than I generally like, though I can't deny that he writes compellingly.
I admit it also took me a while to get my head around the historical context; it's not a period I know a lot about. That made the first half of the book feel very slow, but the second half was more gripping.
This is my #DoubleSpin!
[Downgraded rating; see comments.]
It was an interesting read, but between this and The Book Forger (in which one of the people who figured out the fraud was a former socialist who spied on his friends, which I feel was presented fairly positively), I'm getting an uncomfortable picture of Hone's views. 2/2 1mo
The POV Hone takes makes sense with what evidence there is and what he wants to do (it's much easier to paint a very clear picture of the characters and reimagine conversations from the government's side, since there's no absolute confirmation of who the writers of the pamphlet were), but. Hmmmmm. 1mo