Something about the way this is phrased rubs me the wrong way, like the author's pointing out a flaw of a particular region, when Europe and US have both had periods in history of 'religious purification' (witch trials, spanish Inquisition), 'anti-intellectualism' (book burning, and I would argue McCarthy era) and barbarism (middle ages, colonialist enslavement and confinement of indigenous peoples).
I fear journalists feel a necessity to focus on the facts that will sell best, and this book suffered for that approach. I wanted more on the manuscripts, their rediscovery, preservation, digitization and housing, their content and significance to the culture/history, rather than the conflict that briefly, if dramatically, threatened them (some destruction). I wish one of the librarians had written it, or Skip Gates. Sad books are not yet home.